- #Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop how to
- #Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop full
- #Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop mac
For example, H.264 compression takes advantage of a hardware encoder that is built into all current Macs. The 8-core system is fine for most editing and compression. However, for most of the editing that most of us are doing, we don’t need to buy the top-of-the-line system to get significantly improved editing performance. – It has enhanced external connectivity and more Thunderbolt 3 ports (so you still have Thunderbolt ports left over for other accessories after connecting a display).īefore the shouting starts, let me say again that if money is no object, buy the top-of-the-line iMac Pro. – It can drive two other 5K displays or up to four other 4K displays. So everything you see on a current iMac looks the same on the iMac Pro:īut, while the display of the iMac Pro is the same as an iMac, the display capability of the iMac Pro is greater: The iMac Pro uses the same display technology as the 5K iMac. With that being said, let’s take a look at the specific components to see which ones make the most sense for video editing. However, if the bulk of your work involves 4K or greater frame sizes, 360-degree VR, RAW files, or HDR, the performance benefits of this new system make it worth considering, because the design of the iMac Pro significantly speeds working with larger frame sizes, faster frame rates, more effects and more processor-intensive codecs (such as HEVC). You might “want” one, but you don’t “need” one. If you are hobbyist, no, you don’t need an iMac Pro. The performance benefits of the iMac Pro don’t justify the expense. If you principally work with SD or HD material, an iMac will be perfectly fine. Keep in mind that Apple reports these performance numbers are based on: “Testing conducted by Apple in November 2017 using pre-production 2.3GHz 18-core Intel Xeon W-based 27-inch iMac Pro systems with 128GB of RAM and pre-production 3.0GHz 10-core Intel Xeon W-based 27-inch iMac Pro systems with 64GB of RAM, both configured with Radeon Pro Vega 64 graphics with 16GB of HBM2.” The iMac Pro can also export HEVC video three times faster.
#Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop full
#Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop mac
“The iMac Pro takes Mac performance to a new level, even when compared to our fastest quad-core iMac.”
This is from the Apple website, comparing the iMac Pro to the fastest Quad core iMac: In other words, there are no new features in FCP X that appear if it is running on an iMac Pro. Instead, Apple’s media apps take advantage of whatever technology or performance benefits are provided in the hardware.
There are no optimizations in Final Cut, Motion or Compressor that focus specifically on the iMac Pro. This includes an all-64-bit architecture, optimization for core technologies including Metal, tight integration with both CPU and GPU and the ability to take advantage of faster I/O - both to the processors and storage. When Apple rebuilt Final Cut to create FCP X, they focused on upgrading its underlying architecture to take advantage of coming advances in hardware. The good news is that you don’t need to buy the top-of-the-line to get a system today that can meet your editing needs for the next several years. But… if money IS an object, then you need to make trade-offs, balancing the performance you need with the money you have. It will be blindingly fast, it will work great and you’ll have enormous bragging rights. If money is no object, buy the top of the line. Also, while the iMac Pro is designed for many different markets, I’m focusing here on digital media. This article is designed to help you make more informed decisions when you don’t have an unlimited budget.
#Mac pro or imac 5k better for photoshop how to
Ever since Apple released the iMac Pro, my inbox has been clogged with people asking advice on how to configure their system.
0 kommentar(er)
